Peskin v. Squires
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Plaintiff appeals from judgment of non-suit in a fraud action. The complaint contains numerous counts, but the ninth, alleging fraud, is determinative of this appeal.
The familiar test of propriety of a nonsuit must be kept in mind. “ ‘A motion for nonsuit may properly be granted “. . . when, and only when, disregarding conflicting evidence, and giving to plaintiff's evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn from that evidence, the result is a determination that there is no evidence of sufficient substantiality to support…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Poulsen v. Treasure State Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.