Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Means v. Ten (10) Acres of Land
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1994No. 80446PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the statutory homestead is subject to forfeiture under Oklahoma’s Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, 63 O.S.1991 § 2-101 et seq., specifically § 2-503(A)(8). We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict between two divisions of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals, Division 3, held that homestead property is not forfeitable under the drug forfeiture statutes in State ex rel. McCoy v. Lot One, Block 7, Oakhurst Addition to Norman, Cleveland County, Okla., 831 P.2d 1008 (Okla.1992). In the case at bar, the Court of Appeals,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- United States v. Thomas Lee Curtis, United States of America v. Patty M. Thompson, United States of America v. Patty M. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Wagoner County Real EstateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Tellevik v. REAL PROPERTY IN PIERCE CTY.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 6717 100th Street S.W.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Torgelson v. . Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave., Renville CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. One 1965 Red Chevrolet Pickup, VIN/C1445S172380Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.