Legal Opinion

Leigh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1985No. F-83-259, F-83-260PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

J.D. Leigh, F-83-259 and David Eugene Evans, F-83-260, were convicted of the armed robbery of an Okmulgee, Oklahoma, pharmacy on the afternoon of March 19, 1982. Their separate appeals have been consolidated, and we affirm.

Appellants contend that the testimony of the owner and his wife identifying the defendants as the robbers should have been excluded due to the witnesses’ exposure to impermissibly suggestive pretrial photographic lineups. This contention is without merit.

The testimony was received without objection at trial. Moreover, the argument is devoid of merit on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Camp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Pisano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McCracken v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Van White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. DAVIS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API