Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Ticor

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1983No. Civ. 66914PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHAUER, P. J.

Plaintiffs, Patricia and Claudia Gomez and Maria Ayerbe, appeal from the summary judgment granted defendant Ticor. The is sues presented are the foreseeability of armed robbery in an office building’s commercial parking structure and the existence of minimal precautions to protect the patrons thereof.

On January 31, 1980, Dario Gomez was in defendant’s building visiting the office of his attorney. Gomez left this office at approximately 8:45 p.m. and took an elevator to the lobby. Once in the lobby, he passed the security guards’ booth and then took either another elevator…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API