Fibelstad v. Glaser
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
YANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
Percy Fibelstad contends that a district court is not complying with our instructions on remand in Fibelstad v. Grant County, 474 N.W.2d 54 (N.D.1991). Fibelstad petitioned this Court to invoke our supervisory power and issue a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to comply. Writ denied.
This case began as a writ of mandamus action by Fibelstad to compel Grant County to assign tax sale certificates to him as a result of his paying delinquent taxes on certain land owned by Laura and Thomas Asbridge.1 The mortgagee of the land, Farm Credit Bank [FCB],…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Iley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Odden v. O'KEEFENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Forum Communications Co. v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Roe v. Rothe-SeegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Ziegler v. MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. G.C.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Knutson v. FoughtyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.