Legal Opinion

Fibelstad v. Glaser

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1993No. Civ. 930011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Percy Fibelstad contends that a district court is not complying with our instructions on remand in Fibelstad v. Grant County, 474 N.W.2d 54 (N.D.1991). Fibelstad petitioned this Court to invoke our supervisory power and issue a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to comply. Writ denied.

This case began as a writ of mandamus action by Fibelstad to compel Grant County to assign tax sale certificates to him as a result of his paying delinquent taxes on certain land owned by Laura and Thomas Asbridge.1 The mortgagee of the land, Farm Credit Bank [FCB],…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Iley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Odden v. O'KEEFENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Forum Communications Co. v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roe v. Rothe-SeegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ziegler v. MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. G.C.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Knutson v. FoughtyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API