Roe v. Rothe-Seeger
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Dr. John Roe (a pseudonym) has petitioned this Court for a supervisory writ directing the district court to vacate its order granting Midwest Medical Insurance Company’s (“Midwest”) motion to intervene in Jane Doe’s (a pseudonym) medical malpractice action against Roe. We conclude this is not an appropriate case in which to exercise our supervisory jurisdiction, and we deny the petition.
[¶ 2] Doe brought a malpractice action against Roe, alleging Roe negligently prescribed the wrong medication, negligently failed to refer her to a psychiatrist, and negligently handled…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trinity Medical Center, Inc. v. HolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HagertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Odden v. O'KEEFENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Dimond v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher EducationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Heartview Foundation v. GlaserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Forum Communications Co. v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Mann v. ND Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HolteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HaskellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Holbach v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.