Legal Opinion

Iley v. Hughes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1958No. A-6662PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

The question at issue in this original proceeding in this Court is this: Does Rule 174(b), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, authorize a separate trial of the damage issues and the liability issues in a suit for damages for personal injuries? We hold it does not.

A brief summary of the events leading up to the filing of this proceeding is in order.

Guy 0. Hancock sued J. M. Iley for compensatory and exemplary damages for injuries alleged to have resulted from an assault committed by the defendant on the plaintiff by shooting him with a .22-calibre rifle. Iley’s principal defense was that Hancock…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Shelton v. BelknapTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fisher v. Coastal Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API