Legal Opinion
Sanchez v. Magafan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 2006No. 04-CV-1076PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge.
Appellant (Sanchez) brought suit against appellee (Magafan), alleging that Magafan had violated the Wage Payment Act, D.C.Code § 32-1301 et seq. (2001) (the Act), by failing to pay him wages Sanchez had earned pursuant to an oral employment agreement between himself and Ma-gafan. See id. § 82-1302 (“Every employer shall pay all wages earned to his employees ... ”). Magafan defended partly on the ground that Sanchez had never been an employee of his — that, at most, he had been an employee of Beta Restaurant, Inc. (a corporation owned by Magafan), which Sanchez had not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Despina Spirides v. John E. Reinhardt, Director of United States International Communication AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Charles Russell Twist v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General, U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Woodruff v. McConkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ramos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hamilton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Pleitez v. CarneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- ZIRINTUSA v. WhitakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Arencibia v. 2401 Restaurant Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Arencibia v. 2401 Restaurant CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.