Legal Opinion
Pleitez v. Carney
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0769 (JDB)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
The final issue in this case, and the only issue now before the Court, is determining the amount of damages to award to plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court declared Stephen Carney and PiersBalmoral, LLC (collectively, “defendants”) in default on June 25, 2008. Thereafter, plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment. The Court granted the motion on November 26, 2008, but pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court ordered the parties to appear for an eviden-tiary hearing to determine damages. The Court held the hearing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Isabel Arias v. United States Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ventura v. Bebo Foods, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Ventura v. Bebo Foods, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Alvarez v. Keystone Plus Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Perez v. C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.