Legal Opinion
Schwamm v. Alpert
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwest McGiverjst, J.
In this action to enjoin transfer of a controlling stock interest in the defendant bank, plaintiffs now move for a temporary injunction to enjoin consummation of the contemplated sale to the defendants Howard Kaskel, Alvin Schragis and Morton Blum. The latter are, respectively, the son and sons-in-law of the defendant Alfred L. Kaskel who is advancing the money for the acquisition of the stock.
Stripped of excess verbiage, the gravamen of the complaint and the affidavits -submitted in support of the application is that Alfred Kaskel is a person of bad repute who may exploit the acquisition of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Barnes v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Levy v. American Beverage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Voorhees & Hoobart, Inc. v. HobartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Family Affair Haircutters, Inc. v. DetlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Shannon Stables Holding Co. v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Jaymar's, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Brunschwig v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Lundy v. SposatoNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.