Legal Opinion

Brunschwig v. Long Island Rail Road

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkin R. Hockert, J.

In an action for a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction, plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction. Defendant the Long Island Bail Boad Company (hereinafter referred to as the “ Long Island ”) moves pursuant to rule 3211 (suhd. [a], par. 7) of the Civil Practice Law and Buies to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.

All four causes of action asserted in the complaint are purportedly addressed against both defendants.

In the first cause of action plaintiffs allege that they are owners of property in the vicinity of a parcel of land known as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York & Harlem Railroad v. KipNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Blanshard v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Blanshard v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Schwamm v. AlpertNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In re ClementsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. GalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Lindner v. Incorporated Village of FreeportNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API