Legal Opinion

Voorhees & Hoobart, Inc. v. Hobart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1937PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The plaintiff claims that by adoption and ratification it has become entitled to enforce a contract in which the defendant agreed not to conduct a furniture and undertaking business in the counties of Yates and Ontario for a period of ten years. Another provision of that contract requires the plaintiff to employ the defendant for a period of ten years.

The plaintiff may not recover in this action unless it shows that it has on its part performed the terms of the contract. (Shubert Theatrical Co. v. Gallagher, 200 App. Div. 596.)

There is a sharp dispute between the parties as to whether the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corpin v. WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Morrin v. Structural Steel Board of Trade, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Shubert Theatrical Co. v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Family Affair Haircutters, Inc. v. DetlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Shannon Stables Holding Co. v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Jaymar's, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Schwamm v. AlpertNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Standard Library, Inc. v. AddisNew York Supreme Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API