Legal Opinion
Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. Davis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 1929PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Because of an alleged violation by defendant of section 66 of the Transportation Corporations Law, an order has been made restraining him pendente lite from operating motor vehicles carrying passengers, baggage or express over certain highways through the city of Kingston to Margaretville, Delaware county. Plaintiff is operating buses over the same highway, under a certificate of convenience and necessity. Defendant operated a bus fine from a point on Broadway, New York city, through Forty-second street to the Hudson river, crossing by ferry into New Jersey, and after proceeding in that State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeightSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States Title Guaranty Co. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Garrison v. Paramount Bus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by33 opinions
- Family Affair Haircutters, Inc. v. DetlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Park Terrace Caterers, Inc. v. McDonoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Town of Southeast v. GonnellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Shannon Stables Holding Co. v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Jaymar's, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1962
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.