Legal Opinion
Jaymar's, Inc. v. Schwartz
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James A. Roe, Jr., J.
In this action for a permanent injunction, plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction pendente lite, restraining the defendants from soliciting or servicing the clients of the plaintiff and from being employed or owning or being otherwise engaged in the beauty salon business or allied fields, within a radius of one mile from plaintiffs’ beauty salons in Flushing, New York, for a period of six months from the termination of their former employment with the plaintiff, until a trial on the merits of the action.
This motion was brought on by an order to show cause returnable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Yome v. GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Kane v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Family Affair Haircutters, Inc. v. DetlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Zurich Depository Corp. v. GilensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Cool Insuring Agency, Inc. v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Shannon Stables Holding Co. v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Career Placement of White Plains, Inc. v. VausNew York Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.