Legal Opinion
Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 1996No. C0-96-157PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellants Arcadia Development Corp., a Minnesota corporation, and Mildred Collins (Arcadia) brought this action against respondent City of Bloomington, a municipal corporation (City). Arcadia challenges the constitutionality of a City ordinance requiring mobile home park owners who close their parks to pay relocation costs to park residents. A'cadia’s complaint alleges that (1) application of the ordinance constitutes a regulatory taking without just compensation and is a taking for governmental enterprise, (2) the ordinance, as applied, is unconstitutional…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Lukkason v. 1993 Chevrolet Extended Cab PickupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Northwest v. LaFleurCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Hawes v. 1997 Jeep Wrangler, Vin No. 1J4FY29POVP493248, License No. 874 PDGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.