Legal Opinion
Lukkason v. 1993 Chevrolet Extended Cab Pickup
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1999No. C4-98-1901PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY,** Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment, William John Lukkason challenges the forfeiture of his vehicle under Minn.Stat. § 169.1217 (1998). The district court determined that forfeiture of the vehicle, used in committing appellant’s third DWI offense within five years, did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause, the Excessive Fines Clause, the Takings Clause, or the Due Process Clause of either the Minnesota or United States Constitutions. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 17, 1998, William John Lukkason was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWI). Lukkason…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Albuquerque Ex Rel. Albuquerque Police Department v. One (1) 1984 White Chevy Ut., VIN 1G8CS18BXE8176575, New Mexico License No. 335-KRHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Hawes v. 1997 Jeep Wrangler, Vin No. 1J4FY29POVP493248, License No. 874 PDGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Schug v. Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars & Fifty Cents in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.