Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1990No. S008824PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*406Opinion

PANELLI, J.

Section 28 of article XIII of the California Constitution (section 28) provides generally that insurance companies doing business in California (other than companies issuing title and ocean marine insurance) must pay to the state a tax based on gross premiums. Subdivision (f) of section 28 provides that with the exception of taxes on real estate and motor vehicles, the gross premiums tax is “in lieu of all other taxes and licenses, state, county, and municipal, upon such insurers and their property . . .1 This case presents the issue whether under section 28 an insurance…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Peralta Community College District v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kennedy Wholesale, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API