Legal Opinion
Vance W. Tolle and Paul E. Ludy v. William A. Starkey
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 18, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6339PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of interference No. 87,020 to the senior party, William A. Starkey, the appellee here. The invention in issue is a method of coating articles made of rubber or synthetic elas-tomers and is defined in a single count which is as follows:
“In the method of coating a substantially electrically non-conductive ax-ticle made from a material selected from the class consisting of rubber and synthetic elastomers, which article includes a metal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marion Den Beste v. Harry MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- O'Donnell v. HarttCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Reed v. EdwardsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Kohl v. WilmsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Winslow v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Squires v. CorbettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Wilbur M. Van Otteren v. William J. Hafner and Gordon H. CorkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Thomson S.A. v. Quixote Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Application of Karl Ziegler, Heinz Breil, Erhard Holzkamp and Heinz MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.