Legal Opinion
Thomson S.A. v. Quixote Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 24, 1997No. C.A. 94-83-LONPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Senior District Judge.
Thomson S.A. (“Thomson”) brought this action against Quixote Corporation (“Quixote”) and Disk Manufacturing, Incorporated (“DMI”), among others, charging that the Defendants’ manufacture and sale of optical disc products, including digital audio compact discs, violated four of Thomson’s patents. 1 The parties agreed to base the outcome of trial on three representative claims: claims 1 and 13 of U.S. Patent 4,868,808 (the “ ’808 Patent”) and claim 1 of U.S. Patent 5,182,743 (the “ ’743 Patent”). 2 On June 28, 1996, this Court resolved questions of claim…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomson, S.A. v. Quixote Corporation and Disc Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002