Legal Opinion

Application of Karl Ziegler, Heinz Breil, Erhard Holzkamp and Heinz Martin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 6, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7613PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-8 in appellants’ application 1 entitled “Purification of Olefin Polymers.” No claim has been allowed.

Appellants’ invention relates to the purification of polyethylene, obtained by polymerization using a “Ziegler” catalyst, by washing with a C1-C4 alkanol. When polymerizing ethylene utilizing a “Ziegler” catalyst, a certain portion of the catalyst component may be retained in the polyethylene as an impurity. In accordance with the invention, this is washed out with the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In re RogoffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Kyrides v. AndersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. Vance W. Tolle and Paul E. Ludy v. William A. StarkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Application of Alois M. GemassmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaffer Tool Works v. JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API