Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. Hartt
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 25, 1935No. 3400PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This is an appeal by the senior party O’Donnell from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to the junior party Hartt of all the counts in this interference proceeding, which counts are numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4, and which were suggested to the senior party by the examiner. The counts are as follows:
1. That improvement in methods of securing a binding coated with meltable adhesive to the edge of a shoe upper, which consists in sewing one edge of the binding to the edge portion of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Collar Co. v. Van DusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Standard Cartridge Co. v. Peters Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Alden v. DeweyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Linkow v. LinkowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Vance W. Tolle and Paul E. Ludy v. William A. StarkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- William R. Polye v. Herbert Bennett UhlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Wilbur M. Van Otteren v. William J. Hafner and Gordon H. CorkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- In re WhittleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972