Legal Opinion
Danzig v. PDPA, INC.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 30, 2010No. AC 31456PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant Ahmed A. Dadi (Ahmed) appeals from the summary judgment and the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Richard A. Danzig, trustee for the Defined Benefit Pension Trust. The defendant Patricia Dadi (Patricia) also appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly: (1) rendered summary judgment against them, as guarantors, despite the plaintiffs having withdrawn the complaint as to them, (2) granted the plaintiffs motions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Solano v. CalegariConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Triton Associates v. Six New Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Antonino v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Brianna L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Danzig v. PDPA, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Danzig v. PDPA, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RuggiriConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016