Legal Opinion

Gatje v. Armstrong

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1904No. Sac. No. 1230PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an action to set aside a conveyance of upwards of three hundred acres of land in Glenn County, alleged to have been procured by defendant from plaintiff by means of fraud and undue influence exercised by the latter toward the former, and to compel defendant to reconvey said lands to plaintiff. The case was tried without a jury, findings were waived, and judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor. The appeal is by defendant from an order denying him a new trial.

The main contention of appellant is to the effect that the decision of the court is unsupported by the evidence, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Donnelly v. ReesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haserot v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Kales v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Sparks v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Walsh v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Krug v. MeehamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API