Legal Opinion

Haserot v. Keller

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1924No. Civ. No. 4387PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to cancel an assignment of plaintiff’s interest in a patent and to compel defendant to account for the profits gained by him by reason of the assignment. The gravamen of the action is fraud on the part of defendant, by reason whereof plaintiff was induced to execute the assignment. Judgment passed for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

The facts as found by the trial court in response to issues tendered by the pleadings are substantially these: Plaintiff and defendant were friends and neighbors residing in the city of Los Angeles. On July 18, 1917, the parties executed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API