Legal Opinion

Kales v. Houghton

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1923No. S. F. No. 9833PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal is by the defendant from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in an action for an accounting.

On or about the twelfth day of July, 1915, the plaintiffs herein and the Van Sant-Houghton Co. entered into the following written agreement:

“San Francisco, June 22, 1915. “Messrs. Van Sant-Houghton Co.,
“503 Market Street,
“San Francisco, California.
“Gentlemen:
“The undersigned offer to enter your employment for the period of five years, commencing July 1, 1915, and to exclusively give their services towards obtaining and handling of contracts to be entered into between yourselves…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hill v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Roberts v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Richards v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Kennedy v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gramer v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. M. G. Chamberlain & Co. v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API