Kelly v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
SUSAN ILLSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Consolidated *1063Class Action Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss, with leave to amend.
BACKGROUND1
This is a securities fraud class action against defendant Electronic Arts, Inc. (“EA”) and certain of its officers and executives2 under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and corresponding SEC Rule…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Solarcity Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Robb v. Fitbit Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Camp v. Qualcomm IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Kim v. Allakos Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- OLEG SHTUTMAN VS. BRIAN PATRICK CARR (L-0638-12, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.