Legal Opinion
Camp v. Qualcomm Incorporated
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 10, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01208Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 Carey Camp, Individually and on Behalf Case No.: 18-cv-1208-AJB-BLM of All Others Similarly Situated, 10 ORDER: Plaintiff, 11 v. GRANTING IN PART AND 12 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Qualcomm Inc., Steven K. Mollenkopf, 13 MOTION TO DISMISS THE and George S. Davis, CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS 14 Defendants. ACTION COMPLAINT 15 (Doc. No. 57) 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the consolidated 18 amended class action complaint. (Doc. No. 57.) Plaintiff opposes the motion. (Doc. No. 19 63.)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.