Legal Opinion
Robb v. Fitbit Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 26, 2016No. Case No. 16-cv-00151-SIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge
Defendants have brought motions to dismiss the claims of Lead Plaintiff Fitbit Investor Group. Dkt. Nos. 107, 110. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court determines that this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for October 28, 2016. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendants’ motions to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
The following allegations are taken from the Amended Complaint, which the Court must treat as true for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Waterford Twp. Police v. Mattel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- City of Miami Gen. Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Ret. Trust v. RH, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Costabile v. Natus Med. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Abadilla v. Precigen, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- IN RE RESTORATION ROBOTICS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATIONDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.