Legal Opinion
Mr. And Mrs. Ardmore Canton v. Spokane School District 81, a Public Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1974No. 72-1250PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MERRILL and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
Mr. and Mrs. Canton and other named plaintiffs brought this action on their own behalf, on behalf of their children, and on behalf of a class described in the margin. 1 They allege that certain “policies and practices” of the defendant school district and its officials of “charging fees[ 2 ] as an incident of par ticipation in the total school program, and of penalizing students who do not pay the fees” deny them and members of their class rights secured by the equal protection clause of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Patsy v. Florida International UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rancho Palos Verdes Corporation, a Corporation v. City of Laguna Beach, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Toussaint v. YockeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.