Toussaint v. Yockey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are a class of approximately 2,000 prisoners confined in administrative segregation in four California State Prisons: Deuel Vocational Institution, Folsom Prison, San Quentin Prison, and Soledad Correctional Training Facility. Defendants are the wardens of the four prisons and the California Director of Corrections. Plaintiffs sought relief on two claims. In Wright v. Enomoto, 462 F.Supp. 397 (N.D.Cal.1976), aff’d, 434 U.S. 1052, 98 S.Ct. 1223, 55 L.Ed.2d 756 (1978) (“ Wright F), a three-judge panel convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281, now repealed, granted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Eddie Williams v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent J.C. Harris, Jr., Area Administrator Aaron J. Johnson, Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Walker v. MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.