Legal Opinion
Wolfson v. Brammer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2010No. 09-15298PublishedCited by 299 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
While a candidate for judicial office in Arizona, appellant Randolph Wolfson initiated this action against the members of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct, the members of the Arizona Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and Arizona Chief Bar Counsel Robert Van Wyck (collectively, defendants) challenging several canons of the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct (Code) that restricted his political speech and campaign-related activities while a candidate for judicial office. While *1052this action…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by299 opinions
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Janet Bell v. City of BoiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Pitts v. Terrible Herbst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Washington Environmental Counc v. Theodore SturdevantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.