Porter v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge.
In the weeks preceding the closely contested presidential elections of 2000, a number of Internet websites were created that facilitated discussions among voters regarding potential strategic ways of voting. Through these discussions, the participants could agree to informally “swap” their votes, generating additional votes for the Democratic candidate in crucial swing states while allowing the third party candidate to garner enough votes to become eligible for federal financing in future elections. Plaintiffs, the creator and users of one such website, brought suit…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by436 opinions
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- National Organization for Marriage, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Buono v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
431 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.