Legal Opinion

Smith v. Freeman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7266PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this action, the appellee sued the appellant and one Joel C. Arnold, in a complaint of two paragraphs, to which the appellant separately answered by a general denial, and an answer by way of set-off.

The appellee replied by a general denial to the appellant’s set-off The issues joined by and between the appellee and the appellant were tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned for the appellee, assessing his damages in the sum of six hundred and ninety-three dollars and thirty-three cents. The appellant’s motion for a new trial having been overruled, and his exceptions entered to this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. SedwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Caldwell v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1849

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Card v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Higgins v. KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. AderIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API