Legal Opinion
Voight v. Saunders
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 15, 1952No. 34875PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action involves questions as to the validity of three ordinances enacted by the board of commissioners of the city of Tulsa, namely: Ordinance No. 5024, which counsel, in their briefs, have designated Ordinance No. 1 for convenience; Ordinance No. 5150, designated Ordinance No. 2; and Ordinance No. 5270, designated Ordinance No. 3. For clarity we shall indicate in parentheses the designations employed by counsel.
In 1923 the Ninth Legislature passed a building, zoning, and city planning law. S. L. 1923, c. 178,' p. 301; Tit. 11 O. S. 1951, §§401-410. Thereafter the city of Tulsa adopted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Makrauer v. Board of Adjustment, City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Wood v. Town of AvondaleArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Blakeney v. Home Owners' Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Burke v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Gregory v. Board of County Comm'rs of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Higginbotham v. City of the VillageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Nicholson v. TourtellotteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.