Legal Opinion
Higginbotham v. City of the Village
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1961No. 38983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
One of the defendants in error, O. Alton Watson, is the owner of a tract of land located at the northwest comer of the intersection of Britton Road and Waverly Avenue in the City of the Village. This is an action to enjohjcthe City of the Village, its officers and employees frornissniiig. any building or occupancy permit applicable to “B-l” Local Commercial Zoning on the tract and to enjoin O. Alton Watson, his agents, attorneys, Contractor and assigns from applying for or receiving any building or occupancy permit applicable to “B-l” Local Commercial Zoning, and from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Speakman v. Mayor and Council of Borough of North PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- In Re DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Oklahoma City v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shelton v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Sabo v. Monroe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Chestnut Hill Co. v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Tulsa Rock Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.