Legal Opinion

Harrell v. City of Lewiston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1973No. 11031PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

This action for writ of mandate was instituted by James R. Harrell and Loretta M. Harrell, husband and wife, and Albert A. Broughton and Connie L. Broughton, husband and wife (referred to herein as respondents). By their complaint, the respondents sought to compel the City of Lewiston, its mayor, councilmen and building inspector, the appellants - herein, to issue the respondents a building permit to authorize construction of a building on premises owned by them which fronted on 17th Street (a north-south street of the City). The proposed structure was designed to be used as…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Hutchins v. PrasifkaTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Heidorn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Burt v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Terrazas v. BLAINE COUNTY EX REL. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Sprenger, Grubb & Associates, Inc. v. City of HaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API