Legal Opinion

Burke v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1960No. 38350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

The City of Oklahoma City commenced condemnation proceedings to condemn 8.56 acres of land owned by the defendants in case No. 141,171. Thereafter it commenced condemnation proceedings to condemn 1.72 acres of land owned by the same defendants in case No. 143,677. The land sought to be condemned is near the Lake Hefner Water Reservoir in Oklahoma County and the 1.72 acre tract is subject to an easement in favor of Oklahoma City and adjoins the 8.56 acre tract on the east.

After hearing exceptions to the reports of the Commissioners, the trial court struck defendants’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Georgia v. City of ChattanoogaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Public Service Co. v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Wrightsman v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Arthur v. Board of Com'rs of Choctaw CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. State, Department of Highways v. MouledousLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. FrankelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. COUNTY COM'RS OF MUSKOGEE CO. v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API