Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hughes Thorsness Powell Huddleston & Bauman LLC

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2005No. S-11084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Maynard Johnson moved to reopen probate proceedings for his father's estate because he believed the legal fees incurred during the closing of the estate were excessive. The superior court denied his motion and Maynard Johnson appealed. We remanded the case to the superior court to determine the reasonableness of professional fees charged to the estate. The probate master held an evidentiary hearing and concluded that the legal fees were reasonable, and the superior court approved the findings. Maynard Johnson appeals that determination and several related…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re the Estate of LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API