Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Larson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1985No. 50257-9PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

This case concerns a dispute over attorney fees incurred in the probate of an estate. We hold that, in establishing the reasonableness of an attorney fee based on hours multiplied by an hourly rate, probate attorneys must offer evidence not only that the hourly rate was reasonable *519but also that the hours spent were necessary in processing the estate. Further, attorneys in probate are not entitled to an additional fee out of the estate in proving the reasonableness of their fees.

Proceedings Below

Carl Larson died intestate on January 27, 1979 in Pierce County. The decedent's cousin, Ivan O.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation, Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Perez v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co. v. SCM CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  5. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Carlton v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Estate of BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bennett v. RueggWashington Supreme Court · 1998

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API