Legal Opinion

In Re Lynch

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1972No. Docket Nos. Crim. 16232, 16237PublishedCited by 583 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

One who commits an act of indecent exposure in California is guilty of a simple misdemeanor and can be punished by no more than a brief jail sentence or a small fine.1 If he commits the identical act a second time, however, the law declares him guilty of a felony and inflicts on him a punishment of imprisonment in the state prison for the indeterminate period of one year to life..2 We adjudicate here the question whether the aggravated penalty for second-offense indecent exposure provided by Penal Code section 314 violates the prohibition of the California Constitution against…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by583 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

578 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API