Stokes v. Van Seventer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AREND, Associate Justice.
The basic problem here is whether the courts of Alaska may by interlocutory order or provisional remedy require the defendants in an ejectment action to pay into the registry of the court, pending judgment, a reasonable monthly rental for their use of the property in litigation. We say, no. Before elaborating on our answer, however, we need to consider first a procedural question involved, and that is whether such an order is an appealable order. A brief summary of the facts of the case will simplify our treatment of the problems presented.
On October 10, 1958, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stolar v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Evans v. GeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Mukluk Freight Lines, Inc. v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Mallonee v. GrowAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Hanby v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.