Legal Opinion

Mallonee v. Grow

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1972No. 1699PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BONEY, C. J., and RABINO-WITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BOOCH-EVER, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Justice.

In 1959 Kenneth Anton brought suit against the parties to this appeal, Rudy Mallonee and William Grow 1 alleging that they had committed trespass to land and had wrongfully converted a tractor. Mal-lonee cross-claimed against Grow on the basis that he acted as Grow’s agent and was entitled to indemnity from Grow for any amount that Anton might recover. At the conclusion of the proceedings in 1961 the defendants were found liable to the plaintiff for a total of $2,250 in damages. The superior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Lockwood v. BowlesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  4. Jackson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. St. Mary v. St. MaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Allen v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Savas v. SavasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Coghill v. BoucherAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API