Legal Opinion
Boldt v. Roth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 2, 2000No. C4-99-953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
Dorothy Boldt brought an action against Kenneth and Mary Roth in Crow Wing County District Court for a prescriptive easement to use part of the circular driveway that had provided access to her home for over 20 years. The court denied Boldt’s prescriptive easement claim, concluding that she had not proved that her use of the driveway on the Roths’ property was hostile. The court found that due to the familial relationship between Boldt and the original owner of the Roths’ property, Boldt’s use of the Roths’ property for her driveway was permissive. Boldt…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Faust v. EGAN McKAY ELECTRICAL CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.