Legal Opinion
Christin v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 1933No. Docket No. 8636PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
By this appeal the correctness of an order of distribution of the assets of an estate is questioned. The statement of facts which appears in the brief of appellant herein is deemed satisfactory. It is as follows:
“Mildred Christin died intestate on December 17, 1929, leaving as her only heirs at law the respondent Emil J. Christin, her husband, and John H. Robinson, her father, if the latter was alive at the time of her death.
“Respondent as administrator of her estate petitioned for distribution of the whole estate to himself as sole heir and in his petition alleged upon information and belief…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Hancock v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Rogers v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Western Grain & Sugar Prod. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Pollack v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hefford v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Lukens v. Camden Trust CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.