Legal Opinion

Pollack v. Hamm

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1970No. Sac. 7865PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

By this petition for a writ of mandate, petitioner sought to compel respondent Hamm, as Registrar of Voters, to refrain from conducting the June 2, 1970, election or any election during 1970 to fill a vacancy in Office No. 3 of the Superior Court of Ventura County. We declined to prohibit the election but issued an alternative writ directing that the results of the June election not be certified pending final determination of the issues raised by the petition. For reasons that are set forth below we have concluded that a vacancy existed in Office No. 3, that this office was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. French v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Barber v. BlueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Aggeler v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fields v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stanton v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Anderson v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cummings v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Lungren v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API