Legal Opinion

Dunphy v. Dunphy

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1911No. S.F. No. 5685PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Timothy J. Lyons, Bishop, Hoefler, Cook & Harwood, and Raymond Benjamin, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

On the twenty-second day of June, 1909, a marriage ceremony was performed between James C. Dunphy and Lydia M. Valencia. Six days later, the plaintiff, James C. Dunphy, commenced this action to annul said marriage by filing a complaint in which he alleged that, at the time of the ceremony, he was so intoxicated from alcoholic drinks that he had no comprehension of what he was doing, or of the nature or effect of said ceremony, and that, by reason of said intoxication, he was then mentally incompetent to contract marriage. He alleged, further, that at all times after the ceremony and until the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. In re Estate of RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Estate of McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Albaugh v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API