Legal Opinion

Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 11, 1941PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover as beneficiary in three insurance policies issued by the defendant company upon the life of her husband, Edward W. Gero. These three policies were identical in amount, and were in force at the time at which the insured is claimed to have met his death. Each provided for the payment of double indemnity upon receipt of due proof that the insured, after the attainment of the age of fifteen and prior to the age of seventy, had sustained bodily injury solely through external, violent and accidental means, occurring after the date of the policies, and resulting…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  2. Burton v. Holden & Martin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Parker v. HoeferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  5. Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API