Legal Opinion

Benson v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 2004No. 0108-07955; A119452PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Oregon officials provided California officials with a criminal history report erroneously indicating that plaintiff was a thrice-convicted felon. That error caused California officials wrongly to incarcerate plaintiff for 43 days, leading to this negligence action. At trial, both plaintiff and the state moved for a directed verdict on the issue of whether plaintiff had given the state timely notice of his impending tort claim. The trial court denied the state’s motion, granted plaintiffs, and subsequently entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $106,500.00. The state appeals. We conclude…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Schiele v. Hobart Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeNucci v. HenningsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Cole v. Sunnyside Marketplace, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Johnson v. Multnomah County Department of Community JusticeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Atkeson v. T & K Lands, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API