Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Multnomah County Department of Community Justice
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 31, 2007No. 040606577, A128667PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*593SCHUMAN, J.
In 1997, when plaintiff was 14 years old, she was raped by a man named Ladon Stephens. At the time, Stephens was under the supervision of defendant, the Multnomah County Department of Community Justice. More than five years after the rape, plaintiff began this action by filing a tort claim notice. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiffs action was barred because the notice was not timely. The trial court granted defendant’s motion, and plaintiff appeals.1 We reverse.
The parties agree that the notice deadline set out in ORS 30.275(2)(b) applies. Under that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Plumeau v. School District #40Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cole v. Sunnyside Marketplace, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Cain v. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Johnson v. MULT. CO. DEPT. COMM. JUSTICEOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Johnson v. Multnomah County Department of Community JusticeOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Cecil Smith v. Evraz Inc. NaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.