Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Oklahoma Development Finance Auth.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 2004No. 99,803PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHargrave, J.
¶ 1 The Oklahoma Development Finance Authority has filed an application asking this Court to assume original jurisdiction and approve $2.25 million in public facilities program tax apportionment bonds to be used for improvements in the Ardmore Airpark Increment District Project. Jerry R. Fent, a resident taxpayer of the State of OWahoma, filed a protest to the bond issue, arguing as a preliminary matter that the bonds had not been approved by the Council of Bond Oversight, as required by 62 O.S.2001 § 695.1. By order dated December 15, 2003, we directed the applicant to obtain the approval of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Grimes v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Morris v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Arthur v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- City of Broken Arrow v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Harvey v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- City of Broken Arrow v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Opinion No. (2009), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.